Thursday, May 10, 2012

Constructing a Water Scheme in Hamarland


During the past 2 years, GTLI has provided 13,000 people access to clean water and disease prevention (healthy hygiene and sanitation behavior) training. Here’s a brief insiders-look at “what it takes” to construct a water scheme in an arid land with few aquifers, difficult road access, great distances and flash floods.
Pre-Funding:
Securing funding for WASH (water supply, sanitation and hygiene) projects in this area is complicated and difficult. First of all, it’s really expensive. The cost/beneficiary ratio is much higher than projects closer to Addis Ababa. And, donors like specifics (type of well, estimated costs, etc.), local government water employees want to help design the scheme (but with long lead times and high turnover of government employees, what is designed vs. what actually can be implemented changes), and the community elders who know likely water sources are concerned about “sacred grounds” which often conflicts with the best location.
 Geo-tech experts must use sophisticated equipment to assess potential sites and determine the best combination: location and preferred water scheme design for anticipated depth. The depth determines the type of water scheme, hand dug or drilled bore-hole, or hand dug well used as a reservoir recharged by a sub-surface dam. Unfortunately, these activities cost money – and government permission – and at this point, we have neither!  So –proposals need to be as general as possible but specific enough to get funding. Not only is it complex – it’s a gamble. Everything is variable . . . nothing is for sure.
 Securing contractor/permission/location post- funding.
This should be easy – but securing reliable contractors to work a two-day drive from Addis Ababa is challenging.
Inside scoop on what really happened during the construction of our latest four water schemes. . .
 The first contractor “snuck out of the area” literally in the middle of the night after drilling one of the 4 contracted wells. It took us 6 months to get the other 3 water schemes in (two shallow-drilled and one hand dug) – and cost 124% more than the original budget.
 During that time, the communities had to improve road access – which they did – multiple times because of contractor broken promises and flash floods. It slowed down healthy hygiene/sanitation behavior training significantly because the community felt GTLI “lied to them” – and refused to participate. Frustrating – but fortunately, through perseverance, at the 11th hour, a reliable contractor agreed, showed up, dug the wells and now the projects will meet their objectives – but over budget.
Our agreements with donors and government stated shallow-drilled wells, as specified by the geo-tech study in three specific locations and one to-be-determined location.  Fortunately, the donors were flexible, allowing us to modify water scheme designs and locations.
A – Only two-shallow drilled wells were constructed according to the original plan
B– One shallow drilled well was constructed 45 minute walk away from the intended location because that’s where water was found.
C – One well was hand-dug because we just couldn’t get the drilling rig to the site. It was impossible to adequately improve the road. The hand-dug well took forever. After digging through six meters of sand, the diggers had to chip away rock. Every week, they threatened to quit – the work was just so hot, buggy and unbearable. Finally, adequate water was found at 12 meters.
Imagine – being in a one meter wide hole, 12 meters deep, chipping rock, day after day, plagued by bees desperate for water.
Flexibility is the key – location, type of well, etc. Now, if only the budget was flexible. . .
 Additional Construction activities:
After “drilling or hand-digging the well,” Top work –supplying the pumping mechanism and constructing the cement platform and Cattle trough – creating a livestock watering area by extending the run off cement trough requires a lot of cement. The cost of cement is skyrocketing; the price has tripled over the past two years. 
Fencing the well and demarcating the Defecation Free Zone, DFZ, (as marked by white paint on tree) is done by the community. They also construct four community pit latrines at the far corners of the DFZ.

 Maintenance:
The community selects a WatSanCo (Water Sanitation Committee), 7 members, 50% female, trained by local government with our technical and financial support to maintain the well, monitor the Defecation Free Zone surrounding each water point, and ensures the fencing around the scheme is maintained. The committee learns the 10 component parts of the pumping mechanism and how to repair the well. The tricky part is providing access to spare parts. Most GTLI projects supply WatSanCo with beginning inventory and a mechanism to purchase spare parts in the future. Currently, that funding mechanism is female goats whose offspring can be sold to purchase required parts. Even though the local government water office is mandated to maintain the wells, the challenges of transportation, communication and budget constraints appear insurmountable and so GTLI builds sustainability mechanisms into the beneficiary community.
Longevity of the water schemes:
When we began working in the area, less than 10% of the 129 water schemes in the woreda (area of approx 2,000 sq. km) were functioning. NGOs (non-government organizations) and local gov’t bodies constructed wells but because mechanisms were not created to sustain the wells, after a short time new wells become non-functional. Unfortunately, organizations tend to construct new water schemes, not refurbish existing water schemes! GTLI is working hard to reverse the trend.
Over the past two years, GTLI has constructed and/or refurbished 26 water schemes – and all of them are functioning. Of course, we still work in the area and constantly check-in and support each WatSanCo. Our long-term goal is to increase Hamar people’s resilience to climate change and encroaching agri-business, which will allow our 13,000 beneficiaries time to gain confidence, resources and skills to maintain their schemes while GTLI is available to “lend a helping hand.”